kmusser: (Default)
[personal profile] kmusser
According to SelectSmart.com:

1. Kucinich, Cong. Dennis, OH - Democrat (98%)
2. Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat (82%)
3. Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat (81%)
4. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat (79%)
5. Gephardt, Cong. Dick, MO - Democrat (76%)
6. Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat (74%)
7. Lieberman Senator Joe CT - Democrat (71%)
8. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol IL - Democrat (62%)
9. Graham, Senator Bob, FL - Democrat (60%)
10. Libertarian Candidate (56%)
11. Bush, George W. - US President (18%)
12. Phillips, Howard - Constitution (10%)
13. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat (-8%)

Too bad Kucinich doesn't have a chance in hell.
Amused at Lyndon LaRouche's placement.

Date: 3 Jul 2003 12:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stealthmunchkin.livejournal.com
Surprised the Greens didn't place at all for you - with me they came 100%, with Kucinich at 94% and LaRouche at -7%...
Highest ranking Repugnican for me was Shrub, at 25th place with 13%... only non-Democrats in my top 24 were 'Green candidate' (1 , 100%) , 'Socialist Candidate' (7, 78%) and 'Libertarian Candidate' (21, 42%)

Date: 3 Jul 2003 12:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stealthmunchkin.livejournal.com
Maybe the Libertarians have declared that *someone* from the party will stand, but not declared who? Either that or they're biased towards the Libertarians and making sure they get included in every result...

Date: 4 Jul 2003 11:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allah-sulu.livejournal.com
The Libertarians will run a candidate.

Nader was just in the news recently, making contradictory statements as to whether or not he was going to run again. It seems his final decision will be based on (among other things) who gets the nod from the Democrats. If one of the moderate Dems gets the nomination, Nader is expected to run; if one of the more left-wing Dems gets the nod (I think Nader mentioned Dean by name), Nader doesn't believe that it would be necessary for him to run.

In any event, he's more inclined to have a Draft Nader movement "push" him to run, like last time, rather than go out on his own.

(When I took the test, I had it give *all* results, so I don't know which ones would have gotten filtered or not for me at that time...)

Date: 3 Jul 2003 12:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faireraven.livejournal.com
LaRouche has been putting out so many negative slam campaigns that have ticked me off, it's unsurprising he's placed where he is. Every last ad I've heard with respect to him is slamming Cheney every chance he can get. While I'm not a Cheney fan (I would hardly shed a tear if he finally had a coronary), LaRouche has put on such a negative slam campaign that it almost makes me wonder if Cheney wouldn't be a better candidate than LaRouche. And that's saying something.

The man needs to get his head out of his ass.

Profile

kmusser: (Default)
kmusser

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 26 March 2026 21:00
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios