Page Summary
elffire78.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kmusser - (no subject)
selki.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dr-zrfq.livejournal.com - (no subject)
awfulhorrid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elffire78.livejournal.com - (no subject)
awfulhorrid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
allah-sulu.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pope-guilty.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dr-zrfq.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Leftovers by
- Theme: Elegant Brown by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 13:44 (UTC)BTW, I love your ICON. I have a friend, who's into Curious George, so would you mind if I emailed her this user icon? She doesn't have LJ so it will probably only be for AIM (if any thing) :)
no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 13:56 (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 14:16 (UTC)what I think is more generally going on is that women are still commodities in the sexual economy, and a man who has a commitment to more than one woman is therefore perceived as getting more than his fair share of female possessions
Yes. You'd think when I'm seeing two poly guys, the fears about the first one "taking advantage" of me would go away ("oh, she's got more than one, I guess she's not just a poor little harem member, then"), but no, the attitude of objectors is "You're letting two different men take advantage of you!". Sigh.
no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:03 (UTC)I honestly didn't see much suggestion of a "V" (instead of a triangle) in the wording of the original article. Furthermore, the picture is probably the best possible for its original purpose of selling newspapers. Face it, if the three were all kissing each other, it would make for a sucky photo.
no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:39 (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 16:11 (UTC)You don't think pictures of women kissing each other would sell papers?
no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 16:51 (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Oct 2005 16:59 (UTC)